Gawker and Queerty are speculating that the radical queer group Bash Back is likely behind the “Glamdalization” of the headquarters of the HRC this weekend.
While credit for the act was claimed by a group calling themselves Queers Against Assimilation in the communiqué we re-posted here on Velvetpark yesterday, this all does seem right up Bash Back’s ally. Yesterday, in the wake of the grassroots activism of the Equality March and my ongoing frustration with groups like the HRC, I cheered this act of "Glamdalism," but after some serious reflection about my values and the history of radical queer protest, the revelation that Bash Back might be behind the QAA raises new questions and concerns.

The scene of the "Glamdalism" at HRC HQ.
As you may recall, the Bash Back folks gained notoriety after protesting the 2007 Republican National Convention, later going on to colorfully interrupt church services, pour glue into the locks of an LDS church, and protest last year’s HRC gala dinner in DC after the HRC agreed to drop trans-exclusion from ENDA. Bash Back groups have also drawn the attention of right wing pundits for their highly invasive and flashy acts of protest and for hate speech declarations such as “The Mormon church ... needs to be confronted, attacked, subverted and destroyed.” (Yes, saying that someone’s entire religion deserves “destruction” counts in my book as hate speech, the same as when Fred Phelps says gays “deserve” to burn in hell.) Curious about Bash Back, I checked out their website this morning, where the group lists the “Points of Unity” around which their members have rallied together. These include:
1. Fight for liberation. Nothing more, nothing less. State recognition in the form of oppressive institutions such as marriage and militarism are not steps toward liberation but rather towards heteronormative assimilation.
2. A rejection of Capitalism, Imperialism, and all forms of State power.
3. Actively oppose oppression both in and out of the “movement.” All oppressive behavior is not to be tolerated.
4. Respect a diversity of tactics in the struggle for liberation. Do not solely condemn an action on the grounds that the State deems it to be illegal.
On first glance, I can’t say I particularly disagree with any of this. While I do believe that it is a moral imperative that queer and trans Americans should have the same legal rights, privileges and responsibilities as our heteronormative counterparts, like the right to marry or serve openly in the military, I get that these particular institutions around which the mainstream LGBT rights movement has chosen to rally are fundamentally problematic.
- Login or register to post comments
- Comments [85]
- Share [+]
Tweet















Comments [85]
Okay ladies. I have posted 2
Okay ladies. I have posted 2 suggestions on what we can do to fight back. I admit they were not fully formed ideas and at least one of them was at least partially humorous, but I have put two suggestions up and I haven't seen even 1 suggestion from anyone else, just people explaining why my ideas wouldn't work.
If we really hope to make changes then we need to instead make positive suggestions or help refine suggestions other folks present. I am open to suggestions/refinements from all of you.
Firecracker of an idea
I have no new ideas beyond lighting a firecracker underneath the chair of every legislator that votes against my rights. Wait. I think I want to stick it up his or her ass and then light it.
Still searching for the right brainy quote.
Haaaaaaa.....
May I vote for one of the big sparkly firecrackers that showers the sky with red, white, and blue sparkly thingys....
It would be soooooo beautiful coming out of their patriotic bootay'zzzzz.
Reread the thread then
I have read your ideas, and am mulling them over. If you read the thread, you will see where I posted an idea I and others have been trying to work out the details for, and to determine if it will work and the risks involved. This may be an area where it takes more than one approach, so I'm in the mind-phase of exploring ideas at the moment, and trying to work them out in my head (as I'm sure others are doing right now).
I'm still in
I'm still in information-gathering mode. Brainstorming in earnest to commence in a day or so.
Can you manage to brainstorm
Can you manage to brainstorm political action and zombies at the same time? Ooh, there's an idea. Zombie political action. Think about it. :zombie emoticon:
Zombie Walking
Probably only cute to me, but I taught both grand daughters to "zombie walk." They throw in a little Michael Jackson leg kick and "oooow" every 5 or 6 steps.
"When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." ~ Pollyanna
LMFAO Rusty! You have to post
LMFAO Rusty! You have to post video of that somewhere. Bruiser doing a proper zombie shuffle sounds must-see. I am still kicking myself for not digging my camera out of whatever box it's still languising inside of in time to take vid of Tristin dancing to Gaga last weekend. FAIL!
Robin, the zombie movie is oddly political (it's a dystopian feminist buddy horror movie), but I've put that story on the back burner and gone with a different project for this class. I think you'll like this one. Will send you some pages once I get going. Ha. The story I've chosen is actually part of my way of doing something about the state of the gay union. I'm writing a satire about homophobia in mainstream, right wing, and queer culture all at once.
And as for the state of my corner of the gay union... I've started to feel inspired by that guy who did all the "GIANT" stickerbombing all over the place, along with Act Up!, MLK, Ghandi, and The Sisters. Still not sure where I'm going with all that, but there's something germinating there. And I was so inspired by the kids who spoke at the Equality March rally that I want to start doing something positive to support and nurture the creative, fighting spirit of queer youngins. Gonna check with my local LGBT Center this week and see what kind of programs they offer. I'd love to start doing free creative writing classes for young folks there.
Idea
Tristin & the The Bruiser need a play date. Camcorders at the ready.
(Am I crazy or does Tristin & the The Bruiser sound like a great comic book duo?)
"When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." ~ Pollyanna
Ha! That would be the height
Ha! That would be the height of hilarity, those two in a room together. And they do sound like a great comic duo. Personally, I think we should just outright betrothe them.
My wacky sister spelled Tristan as "Tristin" because she was afraid he'd get nick-named "Stan." Oh, and one of his nicknames is "Bubba," so we could actually call the comic Bubba and The Bruiser, which is even better.
Tristy's new words last weekend were "moon" (he pointed out the actual moon and moon shapes on signs and stuff) and "stuck." (The latter was uttered a la, "ah tuck!" after he crawled into my cats' little play tent in my office and couldn't get all the way out again.) Incidentally, being an auntie kind of rules. /dote
As are others amongst us
First we have to toss ideas out there. Then, we have to mull them over. Then, we pick the one that would seem to be the most effective. Then we act.
Let me...
grab the 'Scooby Gang' and I'll get back to you!!!
Lake
question 4 Julia
Question for Julia:
If you do not disagree with this:
2. A rejection of Capitalism, Imperialism, and all forms of State power.
What would you like to have in its place?
Puppies and rainbows, of
Puppies and rainbows, of course. (I'm a dirty pinko hippie socialist, remember?)
color me pink o
When I grow up I want to be a fellow traveler with Julia.
"When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." ~ Pollyanna
Vacancies on Rainbow Island
If all the cool kids keep growing up, who will inhabit Rainbow Island?
You are a dirty, pinko,
You are a dirty, pinko, hippie socialist. It's one of your more endearing qualities.
come out, come out
I always thought "pig" was coupled with "capitalist pig", but what do I know?
I posed a serious question. I am always curious about what ppl think is the solution.
Are you for socialism? something else?
If you're not for capitalism, then what are you for? Why are you avoiding answering this question? Is answering tantamount to "outing" yourself?
Why?
Moon & McCartney both declared themselves to be socialists on this site, altho McCarney dreams of being a socialist who earns $80,000. (I think I've seen those kind of socialists...They are the officials in charge of everything; the only ones with higher incomes full of perks.)
Waiting for your answer!
Andrew
Just got a new best friend ME.
:)
He is definitely an awesome man...
How the HRC cow ate all the cabbage
Great post J. It's my first time here, and I have a lot to say. Sorry. I promise not to do this every day. I learned my lesson the last time.
Anyway-
For me, your money shot was this: "I woke up today feeling demoralized and depressed about all of this, and after watching this video, came to the conclusion that the only way to begin to feel better about the sorry state of the gay union is to actively DO something about it."
I’d say that about sums it up......
But wait, there's more--- This is what happened to me this weekend in D.C. I thought I'd chime in, because, well, that is what I like to do.
I marched on Sunday. On Saturday night, I was outside the Washington Convention Center for the first time in over 10 years. I was outside rather than inside, where I normally can be found sitting at my fabu table drinking my pretty drink and wearing my very best big-girl drag. When the tickets went on sale a few months ago, I thought "nope. I quit. I cannot stomach another night of self-congratulatory circle jerking at the National Dinner". It turned out to be a really shitty year to choose not to exercise my ticket option and grow some alternative values, but I digress... Instead of being inside, I was outside watching the protestors. After I told the Phelps idiots to suck my dick (as has been my long-standing custom), I watched and listened. Although the protest was billed as something intended for Obama, it became pretty clear that it was a thinly veiled anti-HRC protest. Honestly, it was pretty lame, and none of the 2000+ people up on the third floor gave a rats ass, just as we/they didn't in 2007 when the Trans activists held a similar vigil. However, is that to say that the protest was a useless endeavor? Nope. It was awesome. In my mind, all movements need dissent to help shape the path toward the promised land. Whether the tuxes heard it or not, it invigorated the hell out of the people who were outside. They’ll take that home with them and use it well.
Now. So. ... Just inside the HRC building lobby (to the left of the pink spray painted writing in your photo) is a glass wall with the names of all the donors who gave over a certain amount of money to purchase and remodel the building. My name is on that glass. If I were asked to guess, I would suspect that I have copiously donated copious amounts of cash and lent my often limited but sometimes elastic talents to help raise over a wazillion dollars for HRC over 20 something years. Does all of this make you think I am here to defend HRC? Again, NOPE. Why? Because all movements need dissent to help shape the path toward the promised land. Still, I can tell you from personal experience that HRC sometimes confuses dissent with disloyalty. They’ll get over it.
I, on the other hand, am pissed about the pink paint. That building means something. It is a physical presence for LGBT people in Washington DC, just like all the other organizations have, and one that stands for something, whether you like HRC or not. People who are unfamiliar with our movement (um, like almost everyone who isn’t queer) don’t know the difference between all the factions. They don’t know what the blue and yellow equal sign on my bumper means and they don’t understand the difference between a top and a bottom. All they know is that the gay building got vandalized by gay people, and I think that sucks.
I'd like to explain the little bit I know about why and how HRC is HRC. It's pretty simple really. HRC is extremely powerful and raises the most money because HRC is really good at raising money and spends a lot of the money they raise on efforts to raise more. Everything you have heard about the internal culture of pissiness and exclusion is true. Unfortunately, by creating an exclusive club that not everyone can join, they have ensured there is a long line of people waiting to join. That's how it has always worked.
The criticisms of HRC are not new. However, the current of discontent seems to be about to breach the dike. (ha). I am here to tell you that nothing could be finer. That is not to say that HRC bashing is fine. I don't think it's a particularly good use of energy, especially when it seems to be the chief activity of certain activists.
Here's a newsflash- Everyone I know who was in that room on Saturday night thinks that Obama hit a home run with that speech, that HRC has been elevated to new heights, thanks to all the priceless publicity (like being on Bill O'Reilley) and that because Obi-wan chose that forum for his speech, HRC is further cemented as the chosen, um, because he chose them.
I can't say that I agree with that view, but I can promise you that it is the prevailing opinion inside the ballpark. Frankly, I was a little bit depressed too when my Facebook updates page was completely full of friends in the ballroom congratulating themselves.
But then it was Sunday. And everything changed.
Back to me- I attended the 1994 March and the 2000 Millenium March and HRC fundraiser Being Out Rocks concert. Both marches were amazing and very well attended. They had gigantic budgets. They were both organized with the help of heavy involvement, money and resources, courtesy of HRC. For that back story, read here: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20000417/gamson It’s interesting background.
This march had a tiny budget and nothing more than a meaningless "endorsement" from HRC. And you know what? The march on Sunday was amazing. This march came to fruition because a very small group of people with little money and comparatively little organizing experience were determined. It happened because a whole bunch of young people who had never taken to the streets in this way were hell-bent on being heard. It was poorly organized, lacked the star-power speakers of the past, was a confusing mess and it had serious soul, baby. Standing in front of the White House chanting YES WE CAN with thousands of lgbt people who were in junior high in 2000 beat the crap out of when I "married" whats-her-name in the mock mass wedding in front of the IRS at the 1994 march.
My Facebook update from in front of the White House read "You can pay $250 to dress up and clap for him or you can stand in front of his house and yell."
I think that's kind of what all this boils down to. There are lots of ways to move the movement. Pick the one that fits and work it girl.
Well, that was thoroughly
Well, that was thoroughly enjoyable, N to the McK.
Careful now
All that well reasoned reasonableness might just start a dangerous trend around here.
Nice to see you in the gayborhood.
Oh, and personally, I would love to see HRC just publicly embrace the glitter. Get a few of the head white dudes to come out all glitter-tastic and it becomes a mere footnote.
Ha!
That's the best idea I've heard. Get Joe Solmoese to glitter up his Prada man purse and stand outside impersonating Peggy Lee signing "I'm Sorry" So sorry.
Perfect
I just listened to Lake's link. Perfect choice.
;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIfdeTioLwU
Lake
"People who are unfamiliar
"People who are unfamiliar with our movement (um, like almost everyone who isn’t queer) don’t know the difference between all the factions. They don’t know what the blue and yellow equal sign on my bumper means and they don’t understand the difference between a top and a bottom. All they know is that the gay building got vandalized by gay people, and I think that sucks."
Exactly!
Karen, good to see you at the Park.
You rock
"I thought I'd chime in, because, well, that is what I like to do."
Infuckingdeed. All that on one Dr. Pepper? Nice.
"When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." ~ Pollyanna
The link
Trying again on the link to The Nation: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20000417/gamson
And FYI, I'm pretty sure that Barney Frank spoke from the podium at one or both of the previous marches. I'll have to check the video, but I think I'm right.
I was a member of the press
I was a member of the press at the 93 MOW and I don't recall Barney Frank speaking. Maybe it was 2000.
How about a little balance?
The anti-HRC monologue on this site is about as one-sided a discussion as I've seen. I don't know enough about it to be the one to present the other side, but I refuse to believe that an organization formed in 1980 has been a singular failure in the cause of GLBT rights. I would like to see someone from the HRC respond to the attacks on it's character and efficacy.
I'm also sick of reading the motives being assigned to those in leadership positions. Not just any motives, but the lowest of the low.
Here's a link to the action page of the site. Looks pretty straightforward to me.
http://www.hrc.org/get_involved/12882.htm
[added: I want to be clear that this is a general comment. I'm not directing it towards Julia specifically. This just seemed an appropriate place to put it.]
"When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." ~ Pollyanna
Rusty rules
In the end, my action figure loving friend, I believe that bashing HRC is a futile way to further the movement. That is not to say that holding HRC accountable for it's policies and decisions (and perhaps questioning how the money is used) is a futile effort. I might also propose that some of the confusion and energy that is being spent cracking on HRC, might better be used developing additional paths to the promised land.
There is much to consider here. I need a Dr. Pepper to fully actualize my thoughts. BRB.
I have tried...
... to get HRC to rebut what I've found or at least provide ANY explanation. All I get from them are donation requests in response.
HRC, according to tax records, showed a $300,000 plus surplus at the end of 2008. And yet, last February, they told the SEIU 1199 that they wanted to cut the pay and benefits of union employees because of losses.
HRC has a roughly $40 million annual budget (as of 2008), and 75 employees. They have $24 million in fixed assets, mainly office buildings. Their operational expense level is 76% (meaning only 24% of monies they raise go to actually doing what people donate to them to do).
And, I've looked at their track record, and tried to find where they've actually accomplished something since 1980 with the estimated three quarters of a billion dollars we in the LGBT population have given them to date.
I would love to hear from HRC on this, as I'm sure many others would. But, for the last 17 years I've been asking, they have yet to give any answer beyond the many, many donation requests they keep sending me in the mail and online.
Going out on a limb here-
First, you ask interesting questions. Your analysis of the annual reports shows you have given this a lot of thought. However, I'm going out on a limb here and suggesting that if you've been unable to get a single answer in 17 years, you might change the tactics you employ in requesting an answer. In 17 years, you could have risen through the ranks and been Chair of the Board of Directors and been in charge of making the policy. This is my qualm with HRC critics. It is possible to afect change from within too. The organization is doing what it's members want it to do, and that they tacitly agree to every time they send a dime or two to D.C. It's somewhat democratic in limited ways.-kind of like the U.S. Congress, in that it's a crappy pay to play, but that's the game.
Here is a tip- On the HRC website, there is a list of every member of the Board of Governors, the Board of Directors and the Directors of the HRC Foundation, which is the 501c3 arm of the organization. After each name, it lists the city each person represents. Find the one closest to you, call them and ask them out to lunch. Or, write to each one.
HRC is a non-profit orgainization. While the employees are certainly vested with the power to make some internal decisions and policy calls, the Boards run the show. If the boards ain't happy, ain't nobody happy. Ask the Board members. They won't answer you directly, but with enough pressure, they will formulate a formal statement. I guarantee it.
Also, in your investigation of the financial reports, take a look at the relationship between te 501c3 and the c4. There is an exchange of money there that sometimes skews the balance. If I can promise you one thing, it is that there is no funny business going on. Certainly, the law is being interpreted in the most liberal ways, but that is how corporate America plays and HRC is nothing if not a gigantic corporation. The culture is directly influenced by it's members, most of whom are corporate, business minded people. That is their kind of activism. I'm not sayig I like it, but I am telling you that is how it is.
Keep on it. There is lots of buried treasure to mine.
I've tried a variety of tactics...
... all of them polite and professional, both as a member and after I stopped contributing.
And, what I am questioning is how 76% of $30 million can go to operational (overhead) expenses in such a small corporation (they employ only 75 people, which makes them quite small indeed), as far as the financial side of things go. And, with only 75 employees, why do they need $24 million in office space?
This is just the money management side of things. I have dozens of questions about how they actually "lobby" others, which to me seems restricted to white tie parties and dinners, media events within the LGBT population, etc.
While I only have a sense that something isn't right here, my main thought is that they are simply politically inept, or just plain lazy. One look at how HRC handled the same-sex marriage issue overall in California over the last decade speaks volumes.
I have a lot of concerns about HRC, and have been quite vocal about them for many years now.
And, if this discussion is any indication, I'm hardly the only one. And the numbers asking questions are growing rapidly.
BTW, the financial reports I look at are the ones filed with the IRS. I also use Charity Navigator to look into where the monies are coming from and actually go, which relies on the same IRS tax records I do. There's not much else I can do with HRC being so secretive about their finances and how they do things.
facts
thanks for doing all that research, CA_Medicine_Woman.
Your writing should get published somewhere with a bigger audience.
LOL
It does, here and on my site, and on occasion in the Lesbian News. I've been trying for 17 years to get HRC to respond to my concerns, with no result. I'm hardly the only one, either.
We got them talking about LGBT needs with the planning and holding of last weekend's march in Washington DC. We should, however, not stop there. We need to be perssistent, annoying, and in the faces of the Powers That Be until we get actual results, not just more talk. We've done the national, time to target the local. Real social justice comes from "grass-roots" action, we who are not part of the "cocktail party elite."
outside the playpen
I don't know what kind of traffic your site gets, but you should publish where hets see your posts. They would benefit a lot!!!
Experimenting with that now...
... on a progressive mainstream blog. So far, everyone's keeping to an intelligent debate (the discussion centers on my main arguments about LGBT rights and Amendment XIV, as well as the national security implications around DADT).
I hope you don't mind, but I
I hope you don't mind, but I just forwarded your response to the HRC, maybe we can get some information. And I'd love to see Grace get an interview with Hilary Rosen.
"When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." ~ Pollyanna
I don't mind...
Whatever gets them to finally answer after 17 years of silence is good with me.
Worms worms everywhere!
Grab a BIG can to store them in for you have set them loose and they are squirming. Good for you for asking the right questions. Keep after it. I suspect you'll find that like although like all Gordian knots, it looks pretty complicated, still you might have a sharp enough sword to slice the sucker in half.
Whee!
Can I get a Wump Wump?
Whoop there she is
NotWump is in the Park. Parteee time.
"When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." ~ Pollyanna
Hi Notwump McKaren ~
It's nice to see you here - welcome to VP.
thoughtfull and great
reflections jules.
There is really a lot to contemplate here and I think the movement is really changing... I mean that in a cultural way and not a policy one.
tweet tweet @gracemoon
You're right Grace...
It's been very emotional to watch the younger dykes taking their rightful place at the front....Standing proud, and looking towards justice.
I cried more than once this weekend - recognizing that our legacy for the younger gays and lesbians may be the sense of pride that they now can wear, without the fear of repercussions. It's very moving....
What a beautiful man....
IMO, Andrew Sullivan said everything exactly the way it is. Thank you for posting the video Julia, he is a man of his convictions. I've witnessed him in several political roundtables, and he can definately hold his own. He is completely right, Joe Solmonese should step down, and stop speaking for people that he is obviously so out of touch with.
Has the HRC ever asked anyone around here what's important to them? Or, where our passions for equality should take us?
I wonder which position, in the Whitehouse, Solmonese will be appointed to when he quits his failed position in the HRC....
Interesting random fact - In 2008, the HRC budget was - $41.4 million
As Ex.Director, Joe Solmonese salary in 2008 was - $338,400
His total compensation package was nearly $400,000
Perhaps some of the 'gay and lesbian advocacy' organizations are so out of touch with those that they allegedly are representing, that they need a reality check. It would appear that Solmonese is representing his own self-motivated interests. One might conclude that his motivation may be - money and power.
As Andrew Sullivan said.....step down Solmonese.
Thank you Julia, awesome blog.
Joe S.
earns more than our Prime Minister. Seriously.
Another interesting tidbit...
After Prop 8 passed last November, I did a little digging, to see who donated what to whom. That December, HRC's web site claimed they raised over $2 million to fight Prop 8. Last February, according to the California Secretary of State's office, HRC had only contributed $474,284 to actually fight Prop 8.
What happened to the remaining $1,636,826 that was donated specifically to fight Prop 8, according to HRC's own claims?
We may never know. All I can tell you is that this is fairly typical for HRC, which has a poor efficiency rating when it comes to how it handles and spends the monies donated to them, according to Charity Navigator.
Hence why, last year, I strongly urged everyone to give directly to Equality California, rather than donate to them through HRC. Who knows what the outcome might have been on Prop 8 had HRC not taken their 76% cut from donations to fight Prop 8.