As I write this, the big IPO of our decade went public today, its such a household name I won't bother to name the company, hint; you’ve already visited it four times today.
I had been deliberating for the past two weeks whether or not to buy some stock on opening day, a day economists and journalists have been hyping—boom or bust—since the announcement two weeks ago. There is a bit of a speculator in me.
In an increasingly dark economic universe, the Facebook IPO is the one happy distraction.
Bankers are poised to take down the world economy (again), thanks to the revelations of risky derivate trading by JP Morgan under the guidance of Jamie Dimon. Greece is about to destroy the Eurozone economy, probably dragging the US down with it. The Dow Jones has been on a downward slide, losing all the ground it gained this year. Is it 2008 all over again?
We so hope not, which is why all bets have been placed on Mark Zukerberg’s social network. After all, wage and capital gains taxes on the newly minted million and billionaires will help to plug California’s budget deficit.
FB is currently valued at 120x the companies earnings (and by the end of the day if all goes well, it could be considerably more), which means it would take the company at revenues today, 120 years to buy itself. In contrast, current Apple stock is valued at 15x its earnings, and Google on its IPO (in 2004) was valued at 80x its earnings.
While Apple, Google and Facebook are probably the top three techs on the tips of everyone’s tongues (say that three times fast), these companies are vastly different in their revenue source, so may not make for a good comparison.
Apple a company that actually makes the gadgets and software that has driven tech for the last 35 years didn’t net its billions until late in its career. The iPod launched in 2005, later iPhone in 2007 and iPad (2009) has driven the six fold increase in apple shares and Apple into becoming the most valuable company in America.
Google was already a search giant when they went public, with revenue growth of over 125% each quarter. Through their revolutionizing Adwords & Adsense—the now ubiquitous
Tweet















Comments [8]
FB stocks FELL FLAT (from
FB stocks FELL FLAT (from NYMag):
"Facebook shares officially opened at $42.05, went immediately up to $42.99 according to Dow Jones, with 82 million shares moved in the first 30 seconds, before falling back to about $40. Throughout the rest of the day, the price hovered around the starting price, thanks in large part to the support of the IPO's underwriters, who fought to keep it from dipping under. At 4 p.m., the finally price was $38.23 — essentially flat."
my prediction is it will go
my prediction is it will go lower next week, as the entire dow drops to 12 - but it will be up in a year.
I think fb is going to figure out how to monetize mobile in a big way. but its gonna take them a little time and as well as weathering the overall economy. When the economy dives, ad dollars are also sucked out of advertising so they won't have as robust a revenue stream as 2011... just my prediction.
tweet tweet @gracemoon
Also I'm glad it didn't boom
Also I'm glad it didn't boom or burst... in a way a good sign that it isn't a big bubble (I think).
everyone who hyped either way was wrong. Going flat really wasn't predicted at all, also it was flat while the overall market tumbled—make of that what you will.
tweet tweet @gracemoon
Oh, will you or won't you
Oh, will you or won't you ...buy FB stock?!
I don't think Sanberg was advocating lesbian relations as much as she was advocating the relinquishing of gender roles in the home. Equity in domestic duties; her slippage was to equate lesbian relations with that equity because women are socialized to be happy homemakers. (See this article, too: http://open.salon.com/blog/shannon_kelley/2012/04/12/who_wants_a_housewife)
oh yes she was! she was
oh yes she was! she was saying lesbianism is better for your career!
tweet tweet @gracemoon
No way! no way no way!!! she
No way! no way no way!!! she was talking about gender norms not lesbionic sexuality ... I have yet to experience a work situation that was due to my lesbianism....
I would have said your work
I would have said your work here at Vp was highly related to your lesbianism......?
Well, I'm glad someone's on
Well, I'm glad someone's on the ball this morning... Must be all the snow... Keeping you on your toes!