Knowing I wanted to write an eco piece today, I first thought I'd cover how Montana Senator Max Baucus is doing his darnedest to weaken that august (and I use that term lightly) body's climate change bill before it even gets out of the Environment and Public Works Committee which is chaired by California's Barbara Boxer. Baucus did such a bang-up job emasculating his own committee's health care reform bill that it's no wonder he wants to gut this major initiative, as well.
But then I saw a story that totally gruntled me, despite Baucus' best efforts at chagrining... car-free cities. Did you know that 25% of British households are sans auto?
All around Europe, concerned citizens are forgoing motorization in places like Amsterdam, Vienna, Cologne, Hamburg, Edinburgh, and Nuremberg, among others. Some whole neighborhoods ban all non-emergency and non-service vehicle traffic. In Groningen, the Netherlands' capital of cycling, 40% of intercity travel is done via bicycle making it the largest car-free area in Europe. Half of the town is fully pedestrianized and entirely closed to through traffic. That's a pretty huge deal considering Groningen boasts 16,500 residents, 75% of whom do not own cars.

The results of de-autoing an area: kids playing in the streets and neighbors actually talking to each other. In fact, a study found that the fewer the cars traveling on a given road, the more social interactions there will be between that block's residents. Folks who live on heavily trafficked streets have about one-fifth of the social contacts as those who live on lightly traversed roadways. All that biking and walking is also good for physical health, in addition to the emotional benefits.
If we must have urban centers, and I fear we must, smart growth and new urbanism are the way to go. Reliable, efficient, and sensible public transportation, coupled with robust regulations and forward-thinking policy could transform our cities into eco beacons. Our crumbling and deficient American infrastructure needs a major overhaul anyway. Instead of patches and glue, why not really go for it?
Imagine the decreased stress levels we'd witness in New York with, say, 75% fewer cars doing battle on the streets. Imagine the leveling of egos we'd see in Los Angeles if 75% of the population took the bus.
As for those of us who don't live in major metropolitan areas, well, maybe we should go back to horse-drawn carriages or something. I'm not sure. But getting the cars out of our cities would be a giant leap for mankind. Even bigger than bombing the moon!














Comments [15]
Breathe!
And without all the cars, we might even be able to breathe while walking and riding our bikes.
public transportation
My mother tells me that Nashville's currently working on putting in a subway system. Franklin (the suburb she lives in) has a trolley that runs between major areas (the square, the biggest commercial area of the city, etc.) and will pick you up at your home if you call them (works a bit like a taxi, but only costs a couple bucks). It's a start anyway.
Really???
I could see that working. There are major hubs/neighborhoods in Nashville that could each be a separate line. Cool!
Follow me, if you dare: @theKELword
Yes
I think for the moment, the subway's just going to be downtown, but perhaps with the success of the trolley in Franklin (it's been running for at least 7-8 years now) that sort of thing will happen elsewhere. Of course, it's more of a bus than a trolley (no cables) but it's certainly better than nothing. I've grown spoiled here in Paris. Public transportation's great here. I miss it when I go back home to visit (it's still pretty hard to get around there without a car).
screwed up priorities
If I lived anywhere that had even a 1/2 way decent transit system I'd give up on POVs completely. I grew up in Chicago and the 1st thing I noticed when I moved to Southern California the paucity of mass transit.
If we really want to solve the problem then the 1st change is re-prioritize where we're spending money. More for mass transit and a lot less on the freeway system. Repair what we have, but quit building new freeways.
I'd also revise the diamond lane system. Instead of one lane for carpooling (the diamond lane) and the rest for single riders — flip it. One lane each direction for single riders and the rest for carpoolers.
The ease and speed with which light rail will be built would be astounding.
We are star stuff. We are the universe made manifest trying to figure itself out. ~ Delenn
Rusty, your plan would make
Rusty, your plan would make my 17 mile commute last and hour and a half! Actually, there are no carpool lanes on the freeway I take to work. I would love to ride my bike into work, 17 miles isn't that far on a bike after all, but it's is quite literally uphill the whole way there. Not only would it take me 2 hours it would land me in the hospital for knee surgery.
Last year on election day I started jury duty that lasted nine weeks and it was nice taking the trolley downtown every day. Except for those two weeks when it rained. I wish we had trolleys all around the county.
What about...
Richard Heene's Flying Jiffy Pop machine?
Follow me, if you dare: @theKELword
Hehehe! That thing did look
Hehehe! That thing did look like it was hauling ass as it was flying across the TV screen. I fear it might be a little fickle depending on the wind though. A good Santa Ana might wind me up in Hawaii. Hey, wait...
going down
I think its the going down that would scare me.
Mo-ped?
Exactly
Robin, that's my point. It's ridiculous that the only way to make a 17 mile commute in a reasonable amount of time is to take a POV occupied by one person. It was the same when I was an undergrad at Cal State Fullerton. From my home in Cerritos it was a 20 minute drive. By bus? Over an hour and a half on two buses. And that was cutting it close because of the iffyness of transfers.
We are star stuff. We are the universe made manifest trying to figure itself out. ~ Delenn
I was thinking that i should
I was thinking that i should have bring a bicycle in my car at my last trip, its a very cool way to visit a new city. In montreal, we have free bicycle, like velib in paris. In France, there are certain area reserved for the peoples who live around. You have a remote control and nobody else's allowed.
But in europe, we have no credit to get, some streets since middle age are too small for cars. Some city in north america ave been created especially for cars (perhaps more than for humans). Thats remind me in montreal, there was a Mayor in the 60's who wanted to remove the Mont-royal (a hill in the middle of the city) because it wasn't convenient for the road system.
-Do not follow me, I'M LOST-
Open the gates!
Hey Pepe,
I hate being locked out. In my old neighborhood their was a very nice park where I liked to walk my dog. It was only 3 blocks in a straight line from my house. The problem was that the 3 blocks consisted of a gated housing development. The only way for those of us in the apartments to get to the park was either walk or drive almost 5 miles.
Personally, I like the take of many native american cultures that believe people cannot own the land, which is a living spirit.
I'm sorry to hear that. The
I'm sorry to hear that. The gate i'm talking about are only for car, its stud in the street but you can walk over.
-Do not follow me, I'M LOST-
Did you know?
At this point anyway, about 80% of the Velib' here in Paris end up either broken or stolen? There's a big market for them in Eastern Europe and North Africa, apparently. Love the Velib' idea, but wish they could figure out a way to curb that somehow....
Yes i know its a pity but its
Yes i know its a pity but its the same every where, in montreal port, they've found a boat full of stolen bicycle who was suppose to go to Cuba.
-Do not follow me, I'M LOST-