Don't Piss Off (or On) the Working Class

Don't Piss Off (or On) the Working Class

One of the biggest races to watch in last night's primaries was the Democratic run-off between U.S. Senate incumbent Blanche Lincoln and challenger Bill Halter in Arkansas. Progressives, including labor unions, put a lot into Halter and damn near got him over the 51% mark. Their point: you can't pander to the working class in your campaign and then vote against them on the issues.

In the past year, Lincoln has stood in the way of both the Employee Free Choice Act and the public option. Those are two huge policy points in the progressive world. Jane Hamsher of FireDogLake.com warned Lincoln last fall that if she stood with Republicans to filibuster against the public option, that she would draw a primary challenger. Hamsher made good on her promise and Lt. Governor Halter was a tough row to hoe for Lincoln.

In the aftermath of Lincoln's slim win, the White House -- or, rather, unnamed senior officials -- took to the mats with the unions. "Labor is humiliated," the source said. "$10 million flushed down the toilet at a time when Democrats across the country are fighting for their lives, they look like absolute idiots."

Money is on Rahm Emanuel for that one. He's probably the only guy in the Beltway who's arrogant enough to call the union leader "absolute idiots."

In response, AFL-CIO spokesman Eddie Vale offered this: "We are not an arm of the White House or the DNC or a political party. We work on issues. And if we feel like someone is standing up for working families, we support them, and if they don't, we won't support it. In the past, people would have assumed that was talk, but now we have backed that up with action.

"Is the lesson they are taking out of tonight that they can go after labor and anonymously trash us and we will put our tail in between our legs and slink home? That ain't happening," Vale added. "My name is Eddie Vale of the AFL-CIO and I'm proud to fight for working families and I don't hide behind anonymous quotes."

If labor sits out the November elections like they say they will, there's a very good chance the now-blue Senate seat will turn red. That may be a lump the unions are willing to take to prove their larger point to the administration and not be taken for granted. At the very least, it's a solid bargaining chip to get the Obama camp to make some actual moves on the policies that workers care about.

One FDL commenter wrote this: "Hey, Labor, come sit by us gays! The view is great."

And they should. Considering that the White House and the Congress have now sold out labor, gays, and environmentalists (There's no more climate aspect in the climate bill, only energy.), the three camps should join forces to really get some movement. Let's see Dems try to hold on to their majorities without us.

 



Comments [6]

minniesota's picture

Question

Kelly, I read an article on an Arkansas news site that said Halter declined to say whether he would vote for that Labor bill. So why was Labor so sure that Halter was for them, eh?

Quote:

"The race was in a national spotlight. National labor unions helped Halter because Lincoln refused to support a bill to make it easier to unionize. Halter declined to say whether he’d vote for or against that bill."

http://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2010/jun/09/lincoln-turns-back-halter...

Still searching for the right brainy quote.

Kelly McCartney's picture

You'd have to ask them.

You'd have to ask them. Perhaps they had a closed-door agreement with him.

Won't you be my neighbor? @theKELword

minniesota's picture

Seems weird to me

The reason I bring this up is that if Halter is unwilling to say publicly how he would have voted for that bill, it does not ring to me as strong endorsement of Labor interests. If I have time, I'll see if I can find some more articles about the race.

Still searching for the right brainy quote.

minniesota's picture

Update

Update: Ohhh, I found an article via Lexis-Nexis Academic in which Lincoln's spokesperson raises that same question about why Halter refuses to say how he would vote "card check" legislation for union organizing (Employee Free Choice Act).

I want to make it clear that I'm a neutral observer about Arkansas Democratic politics and raised this question all on my own after reading the Arkansasonline article. I was just curious about the local politics and reasons for the infighting, which seems to play right into the Repubs hands.

Still searching for the right brainy quote.

geek4grammar's picture

agreed!

I'm with you, kel. and with eddie vale. we should be organizing around issues, not around identities-- that's the only way we're ever gonna build any bridges enough to throw our weight around. like the famous image of all the little fish swimming together in the shape of one really big fish to chase away the other big fish in leo lionni's classic lefty kids' book, swimmy! 

We're all born naked. The rest is drag.
--RuPaul (appropriating Judith Butler for the masses...)

Kelly McCartney's picture

There it is!

George Lakoff is keen on the fact that the disorganization of the left is why we can't get anything done. So many different factions working on only their small potato. If we had solidarity among the progressive camps, then all those Blue Dog Dems would have to answer to us and the purported lefties would have to stop running to the middle when the going got hard. The liberal 'base' is taken for granted during elections and then dismissed out of hand during governing.

Won't you be my neighbor? @theKELword