Rachel the Vampire Slayer has a nice ring to it.

If anyone thinks she is, kindly describe the best way to debate someone who makes claims like there:

“Girl-power feminists who got where they are by marrying men with money or power — Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Arianna Huffington and John Kerry — love to complain about how hard it is for a woman to be taken seriously. It has nothing to do with their being women. It has to do with their cheap paths to power. Kevin Federline isn’t taken seriously either.”

On President Clinton: “Well, he was a very good rapist. I think that should not be forgotten.”

On Voting: “It would be a much better country if women did not vote.”

On the Press: “My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building.”

“We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this is war.”

“Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America’s self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.”

“Only Spain remains a nation of women. As long as Spain exists, it will not outlive the shame of its gutless capitulation to terrorist bombings in 2004. It is worse than Sweden’s neutrality toward Hitler.”

sexy indeed.

ARGUE against Coulter and find way to be heard and be convincing. CAMW, you and others sure have the intelligence to do it. Violence and suggestions of violence are simply wrong (and ultimately backfire), regardless of stance.