Is Right Wing Media Gasping Its Final Breath?

picture-1.pngAnn Coulter, In an attempt to promote her new book “Guilty” was canceled on by NBC’s Today Show, ironically… today. CBS picked up the slack but it didn’t seem like Harry Smith, host of The Early Show, was all that crazy about hosting the right wing nut either, calling her views “sophomoric” among other things.


Watch CBS Videos Online
Do you think right wing extremism is finally going out of style? Well NBC isn’t sure either because they just re-booked Coulter for tomorrow.


  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Fleck
  • Furl
  • IndianPad
  • MySpace
  • Socialogs
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis

No comments yet to Is Right Wing Media Gasping Its Final Breath?

  • Rusty

    Several people have advocated taking Ann Coulter’s statements seriously and engaging her in debate. There is an incorrect assumption that she publishes her books and columns because she wants to engage in debate. Coulter tosses rhetorical incendiary devices to get attention and sell her books She’s not interested in debate.

    If anyone thinks she is, kindly describe the best way to debate someone who makes claims like there:

    “Girl-power feminists who got where they are by marrying men with money or power — Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Arianna Huffington and John Kerry — love to complain about how hard it is for a woman to be taken seriously. It has nothing to do with their being women. It has to do with their cheap paths to power. Kevin Federline isn’t taken seriously either.”

    On President Clinton: “Well, he was a very good rapist. I think that should not be forgotten.”

    On Voting: “It would be a much better country if women did not vote.”

    On the Press: “My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building.”

    “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this is war.”

    “Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America’s self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant.”

    “Only Spain remains a nation of women. As long as Spain exists, it will not outlive the shame of its gutless capitulation to terrorist bombings in 2004. It is worse than Sweden’s neutrality toward Hitler.”

    [Reply]

  • Anon

    BREATH

    NOT BREADTH

    THX

    [Reply]

  • toodlin

    Maybe Rachel Maddow can come over and shake her up a little morning eye-opener, so she can just loosen up a lil and check it with the vitriol. I am reminded of the incident several years back where a tipsy John Riggins (Redskin running back) says to Justice Sandra O’Connor at a dinner party, “Loosen up, Sandy baby!”

    [Reply]

  • peacekitty

    Boy she is one twisted sister. For a second I thought she was making a little bit of sense by saying that Obama isn’t/won’t get more death threats for being black than the right wing Republicans such as Bush/Cheney/ etc. have gotten. She’s correct there. Anarchists , Communists etc. have threatened Bush and Cheney’s lives on many occasion. I’ve heard and seen them do it.

    But…what does that have to do with anything? Is she saying that all liberals are evil whiners who are just unhappy with their lives and blame “the system” for it rather than their own actions……AND Right Wingers are the “good” people? She seems to be the one who is doing most of the whining. Sophomoric describes her pretty well.

    Then she goes off on some twisted explanation of why she thinks that Liberals are actually the oppressors and Republicans are the victims. Huh??

    Harry Reid was just as annoying and I didn’t feel that he gave very compelling arguments either. That interview was a waste of time and it makes me angry that people like that make a hell of a lot more money than teachers and other more intelligent people in the world.

    [Reply]

  • Dornac

    When you face the deep drivel (she is close to daft, deficient I think), what can you say?
    Nope. She needs a doctor.
    The problem is that you can’t cure retarded persons, so even a doctor can’t do anything fo her.

    [Reply]

  • pyramid

    upon reading these comments on this interview i am struck by the condemnation of free speach…as for the interveiwer, i agree with annie oakley , harry smith’s body language is agressive and invading..if you turn off the sound you will see it.
    some of what she purports is truth some is meant to incite riot.
    fostering hate against anyone including bush, coulter or whoever does not agree with you does not raise you to a higher level of thought…on the contrary, it brings you closer to that which you despise…..

    [Reply]

  • Rusty

    Coulter is like some weird science experiment gone horribly wrong. She was part of that batch of Femme-Bots who made their names during the Clinton impeachment and never went away.

    I’m still waiting for that house to drop on her.

    [Reply]

  • Annie Oakley

    I support freedom of expression and cringe at even flippant suggestions of “welding her mouth shut”.

    That said, there’s LOTS WORSE problems we could be looking at…

    Like the anti gay-marriage, anti-choice Kaine who will probably run the DNC. Or Gaza!! or someone’s SILENCE re Gaza while he instead plays golf and tans himself!

    http://hillaryunleashed.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/code-pink-protest-in-front-of-obamas-hotel-now/

    [Reply]

  • Xanadu

    Watched her on Fox last night (American morning). I don’t hate often - but man, I really REALLY hate her.

    I can’t imagine why she’s had multiple broken engagements? … Imagine dealing with that at the breakfast table every morning! Jesus.

    Usually I wouldn’t question why someone doesn’t have kids, but if she’s straight, pro-life, conservative, Christian then why is she childless?

    To be 47 (dated many men) and to not have had a baby or an abortion along the way for an unplanned pregnancy is quite a feat.

    [Reply]

  • conlite

    She seems more willing to “preach” rather than discuss ideas. (I don’t think they managed to complete one question-answer-response cycle without interruption.) Pretty much a walking definition of fanaticism. Someone who clings to one point of view this desperately is definitely a menace.

    However, being reasonably pretty and saying outrageous things is one way to get to be a celebrity these days. She is certainly a shrewd self-promoting businesswoman.

    [Reply]

  • Not2Taem

    “The people who are mugged by the millions of illegitimate children born every year.”
    Anybody have a connection with the Wizard? This one needs a brain, a heart, and a soul.

    [Reply]

  • Unfortunately, neoconservative extremism will continue to be promoted so long as it sells. By putting Coulter on the air, she gets to promote her books and her ideas, which means millions of her fans now know she has a new book out and will flock to the local stores in droves to buy them. So long as the airwaves and media are mostly owned by those who share her views (roughly 95% of all print and broadcast media is owned by conservative Republicans), Coulter will get all the air time she wants, and then some.

    While right-wing neocon extremism may not be all that fashionable at the moment, it sells.

    Next time, they need to weld her mouth shut. Obviously, the wires weren’t strong enough!

    [Reply]

  • RobinR

    What a fucking whack job! I’ve never watched an interview with her before, just heard other folks talking about what a lunatic she is. In fact… I loved when Kathy Griffiin says as a person she hates Ann Coulter, but as a comedian she LOVES her. Kathy had to follow her on The Today Show one morning and didn’t talk about her own show because she was having too much fun making fun of Ann. Awesome.

    But Harry has a point- how can she expect to be taken seriously when she’s trying to make fun of everything. Even worse, when she’s not even funny.

    [Reply]

  • Her voice irritates me. Her words bore me.
    But…….. her hair is gorgeous. :)

    :shock: Is she on crack ??

    [Reply]

  • Well, I for one, like her. When someone steps out with that much ridiculous hoo-ha, she satirizes the point of view she represents. I imagine intelligent conservatives wish she’d shut the fuck up.

    [Reply]

  • Minniesota

    Ann Coulter has a brain. I wish she would use it.

    [Reply]

  • Tex

    You have to be wary of a person who is always right…..and a woman who doesn’t want women’s rights…..OH, OH - I’VE GOT IT - she’s a red state dude!

    Makes perfect sense,

    Tex

    [Reply]

  • I saw it this morning and puked up my breakfast. She is ridiculous. Harry Smith was great though.

    [Reply]

  • When I visit book stores I always transfer at least some of her books from the social science section to the science fiction or fantasy sections where they belong.

    [Reply]

  • hmm…certifiably insane…Hinkley’s not the only one. She actually makes me nauseous with her nonsensical rant, and more nauseating is the fact that people are giving her the time of day. However, I feel that the only reason she is getting some moments of airtime is because of the controversy that she stirs, the public loves it and loves to hate her, we love to have someone to direct our anger towards. This is why conservative idiocy won’t die a quick death.

    [Reply]

  • Rusty

    Can’t we just banish her to Alaska or something?

    [Reply]

  • Robo-neo-cunt is such a fucking skank. Just loved the basic-instinct-leg-crossing, BLECH!

    Hey Ann, lay off the crank or whatever you’re snorting/smoking, and, those boots are NOT working for you.

    [Reply]

  • peacekitty

    Don’t be shy, tell us what you really mean Fastgurrrl. :)

    [Reply]

  • The Insomniac

    Well she certainly has no shortage of energy — just gray matter.

    [Reply]

  • LOL, let me guess, you’re not exactly a big fan of Coulter’s?

    [Reply]

  • Annie Oakley

    fastgurrrl: i cannot believe you are telling ann “her boots are not working for her”???

    and leg-crossing is “basic instinct”?

    Puhleeze! I don’t wanna be judged for my (dirty western dung covered) boots or crossing or not crossing my (hairy or not hairy, long or fat or stumpy or slender) legs (in a skirt, pantsuit, dress, thong, whatever).

    go ahead and criticize her but do so intelligently.

    Will women ever lay off their sexist treatment of other women? EVER???

    [Reply]

  • PK, I’m working hard to break out of my shell, it’s a process. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaa! ;)

    [Reply]

  • peacekitty

    Haha clever AC. :) The Library of Congress catalogues all books dealing with religion in the “BS” section. Who says librarians don’t have a sense of humor? ;)

    [Reply]

  • OMG I’m so going to do that. love itttttttttttt. haha

    [Reply]

  • Not2TaemBigAssWoman

    My new favorite covert social equalization exercise! :D

    [Reply]

  • Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

    I have to say, when Harry threw his arms out and suggested she get herself a cross, I laughed so loud I startled the cat.

    [Reply]

  • The one time I found one of her books, I used it to test a paper shredder.

    The shredder refused it.

    [Reply]

  • Dornac

    That’s very funny!! But you still give her importance.
    Shouldn’t you put it in the “mind deficiency” (medical) section?
    She is a case.

    [Reply]

  • I know, I threw up in my mouth a li’l too.

    Ya know, I wonder how wasted/twisted someone has to be to get turned on by and down with THAT. *GAG*

    [Reply]

  • Maybe that’s why Coulter is so thin, and not because of her thyroid. Maybe she just listens to her own words and blows chunks in response to them?

    [Reply]

  • Probably meth, lol.

    Actually, from what I can tell, she has a fairly serious thyroid problem, at least that’s how she looks and acts.

    Coulter is proof that beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes to the core of one’s soul.

    [Reply]

  • Annie Oakley

    LBDL: her hair is gorgeous…LOL! She also has the LONGEST NECK of any living woman! (her hair accentuates that)

    The dynamics are interesting to watch. Coulter does a good job of standing up for herself (note Harry Smith POINTING at her – just like a man who thinks he’s talking down to a child, as men-who-consider-themselves-experts so often do when talking to women.) He leans forward and keeps invading her space with his hands – intimidation tactics. He insults her repeatedly, even opening the conversation with a personal insult. Coulter never insults him personally, holds her own and gets in the last word.

    She’s also right about the assassination thing: Hillary received more death threats than Barack but no one ever talked about that.

    Coulter, like her or not, wins here.

    [Reply]

  • She is dangerous, in the extreme. She promotes hate, and does it in a way that incites those most likely to take direct action based upon what she says.

    And, while I have met intelligent conservatives, I have yet to meet one neocon that has an IQ with more than two digits in it.

    [Reply]

  • Like that state doesn’t have enough problems already!

    [Reply]

  • Not2TaemBigAssWoman

    Oh-ho-ho-ho! :lol: Taking care of #5, as usual.

    [Reply]

  • Coulter has the ultimate contraceptive device: Herself.

    And no, I would rather not imagine dealing with her at the breakfast table, at least not without a loaded gun in my hand pointed at my temporal lobe. I thought this one through… If I shoot her, I have to treat her injuries. Of course, I could always wait until January 18th to do it, and then I could cite “personal conscience” as a reason to both take her out and then to not treat her. In my defense on both charges, I would just present the jury with her books, and force them to deliberate while listening to her endless spewing of hate.

    I figure 5 minutes from deliberation to aquital?

    [Reply]

  • Not2Taem

    I’m gonna guess inhospitable womb.

    [Reply]

  • She’s a neocon. They cannot tolerate even the perception that someone other than they have any opinion worth hearing, and so they just spit them out and then shout everyone down until the listeners get sick of it and give up.

    As far as reasonably pretty goes, anyone thinner than I am is either on drugs or has serious health problems. I personally do not find anorexia attractive, especially in someone my age.

    [Reply]

  • A suffering soul on the way to the Kingdom of Heaven
    Shouts on the news, “they are the godless ones”
    But the anger inside, and the fear that it hides, never leave her
    When the cameras are gone, when the cameras are gone

    Guess who exactly Melissa Etheridge wrote that about?

    Coulter, according to every single thing ever said or written about her, has NEVER been capable of one ounce of empathy or sympathy, and is completely devoid of any sense of tolerance or acceptance.

    And Coulter is a True Believer, in that she honestly believes every single thing she says. She also is a firm believer that the ends justify the means, without any mental or moral reservation.

    Like I said, very dangerous person.

    [Reply]

  • apple crumble

    yes, she wins the crazy lady of the day award.

    [Reply]

  • Rusty

    She gets my vote, hands down.

    [Reply]

  • Rusty

    deleted by author; not meant as a reply

    [Reply]

  • Free speech also means that we should have the right to be critical of that speech. The Coulters of the world would love to have their say and no one challenge it, because they think free speech only applies to them, and that no one should be allowed to challenge their words of hate. They spew forth hatred, and then play the role of victim when the targets of that hatred fight back.

    If Coulter and her ilk don’t want anyone challenging them, they should keep their fracking mouths shut, period.

    [Reply]

  • Dornac

    really?
    Where did she hide her brain?
    I can’t believe it.
    Minnie, are you sure? Frankly… there is a problem.

    [Reply]

  • Rusty

    “Sophomoric and simplistic”. He gave her way too much credit.

    [Reply]

  • peacekitty

    Correction, that’s Harry Smith, not Reid.

    [Reply]

  • Ok, mom, thanks for the advice.

    [Reply]

  • Erin Blackwell

    it’s not sexist on FG’s part, it’s sexy. FG would LOVE to admire these sartorial choices or find them perversely appealing, if only AC had an attractive brain/spirit. in the absence of intellectual/emotional affinities, FG fixates on WARDROBE, a freudian displacement technique, or poetic device (part for whole, synecdoche) allowing her to vent rage without doing irrevocable harm.

    [Reply]

  • EB, you’re making me crush HARDER on you. ;)

    [Reply]

  • Wow, brains and wit! I think I’m in love, lol! ;)

    [Reply]

  • Annie Oakley

    so i guess that’s what the guys were doing when they criticized Hillary’s ankles, her pantsuits, her cackle, and why they described her as a “washed-up old hag”, a “hellish housewife”, a “scolding mother” (as fg called me), etc etc etc all because they would hve loved to find her appealing but “HC didn’t have an attractive brain/spirit. in the absence of intellectual/emotional affinities, the men fixated on HC’s WARDROBE and LAUGH, freudian displacement techniques, or poetic devices (part for whole, synecdoche) allowing THEM to vent rage without doing irrevocable harm.”

    sexy indeed.

    [Reply]

  • conlite

    Yah for sure. Skin and bones not really my type either, but I don’t think she can be classified as ugly looking (in the sexist sense) and that makes a difference on TV.
    Maybe the anorexic look appeals to her fellow neocons? Are neocons the kind of sexist people who want a woman to be skinny rather than healthy? I don’t think I have met any neocons (fortunately it seems) - we only have old-fashioned conservatives around here.

    [Reply]

  • Not2Taem

    Her theme song. Right on!

    [Reply]

  • Not2Taem

    Oh damn! I can’t breathe. I have a new one: TFFTB
    Too fucking funny to breathe AKA CMW
    :lol:

    [Reply]

  • Not2Taem

    Or maybe Rachel could just shake her. I know, she wouldn’t do that; Just play yourself a sweet little daydream sequence -until it hurts, and then just a little longer. Pardon the inexact quote. Time for beddy-bye.

    [Reply]

  • Why is it that freedom of expression means anyone can say anything they want, even if it incites violence, but that no one has the right to express an opposing view? Why is it the right wing is always playing “victim” when they get called out for the things they say and do?

    No, Coulter brought this crap on herself, as did Limbaugh, O’Reilly, and the rest of the neocons who hate this country and everything it stands for.

    [Reply]

  • I wouldn’t care if Coulter was what my ideal of physical beauty would be. The moment she opens her mouth and spews forth her hatred, she still becomes one of the ugliest women I know of.

    [Reply]

  • Annie Oakley

    “welding her mouth shut” is violent. If someone would state that our mouths should be welded shut we would call them misogynist and anti-free-speech.

    ARGUE against Coulter and find way to be heard and be convincing. CAMW, you and others sure have the intelligence to do it. Violence and suggestions of violence are simply wrong (and ultimately backfire), regardless of stance.

    [Reply]

  • Rusty

    I read this too fast the first time and thought you wrote, “Or maybe Rachel could just stake her.”

    Rachel the Vampire Slayer has a nice ring to it.

    [Reply]

  • Hey, Annie, if you’re going to quote me, get it right. “Ok, mom, thanks for the advice.”

    [Reply]

  • Not2Taem

    OK, for that I might watch a vampire flick. LOL

    [Reply]

  • Dornac

    who is “sophomoric and simplistic” ? Ann Coulter or I (I wouldn’t have got the very deep thoughts of this woman… so deep that you can’t see it).

    [Reply]

  • Rusty

    “who is ’sophomoric and simplistic’” ?
    Yikes. I was talking about Coulter, of course.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>